The Day the Plan Gets TestedA VP in a critical role unexpectedly left. I thought we were good. We had four identified successors. Two were ready now. The CHRO called the headhunter. We hired externally. It took four months to find the right replacement. I have worked in succession planning for nearly 15 years. I have built the grids. I have facilitated the talent reviews. I have helped plot the names. And I keep seeing the same thing. A leader leaves. The plan stays in the folder. The search firm gets a call. Most organizations have a succession plan. Very few have a succession reality. The Numbers Are Not SubtleAt this month's ATDOrgDev Conference, I presented on why succession planning fails. Here is the backdrop. According to Challenger, Gray and Christmas, CEO departures rose 16% in 2024, and 44% of new CEOs were hired from outside. Those organizations had successors on paper. They went external anyway. Project Next Leadership asked leaders to grade their own succession process. The average score was a failing one at 5.5 out of 10. We are spending hours on something we do not trust. None of this is new. Here is what is new. What I Heard in the Other RoomsKristi Broom shared how AI is becoming a labor source, and organizations are deciding which work is for AI and which is for people. Coordination and routing work is moving to AI. Tracking performance, accountability, and developing people stay human. She also suggested organizations will flatten and some management layers may collapse. Sit with that for a minute. Managers are where leaders get built. They give the stretch assignments. They notice the quiet high performer with potential. They have the hard conversation about what is next. If layers thin out, the pipeline does not just get shorter. It gets harder to see. The Skills That Define "Ready" Just ChangedKristi also framed five capabilities that stay human in AI-shaped decisions: delegation, empathy, curiosity, discernment, and judgment. Discernment is choosing what matters. Judgment is making the high-stakes call. Both skills will need upgrading as we move forward with AI. Now compare that list to your last talent review. Were you rating those? Or were you rating last year's results? James Clear puts it this way: "You do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems." A succession plan is a goal. Succession readiness is a system. Four Pivots, Plus One Honest QuestionIn my session, I shared four pivots for modern succession:
The honest question is this: if managers have less time and fewer layers, who is doing the developing? That is the gap I would work on first. Try This in the Next 90 Days
Katrina Kennedy reminded me: Reflection is how experience turns into readiness. Do not skip it. One Last ThingThe goal is not a succession plan. The goal is succession readiness. Succession planning is not about predicting the future. It is about preparing people to meet it. Three Ways We Can Work Together
Reflect: If a key leader left next week, who would you call first? Is that person on your plan? Is that person ready, or just familiar? Reply and tell me what you find. I read and respond to everyone. Regina |
Regina is a certified coach, talent management partner, and podcaster who writes about leadership, talent development, and empowering wildly practical strategies for personal and professional growth. Check out my website: https://www.collectivegrowthcc.com
Unemployment at 8% by 2040. Not because of a recession. Not because AI took all the jobs. Because the jobs that exist and the workers available to fill them stopped lining up. That is the finding from new data out of Indeed's Hiring Lab, covered this week by Forbes. The real crisis is not artificial intelligence. It is a growing mismatch driven by the convergence of three forces: baby boomer retirements, slower immigration, and AI quietly reshaping white-collar work from the inside out. The...
Here is something I see constantly in my work with organizations. Someone comes with a request to solve a business problem. The request sounds reasonable. The professional gets to work. Something gets built, delivered, and checked off the list. And six months later, nothing has changed. Not because the thing was bad. Because it was solving the wrong problem. The request on the surface is almost never the whole story. A call for an internal communication is sometimes a change management...
Here is something I see constantly in my work with organizations. Someone comes with a request to solve a business problem. The request sounds reasonable. The professional gets to work. Something gets built, delivered, and checked off the list. And six months later, nothing has changed. Not because the thing was bad. Because it was solving the wrong problem. The request on the surface is almost never the whole story. A call for an internal communication is sometimes a change management...